↓ Skip to main content

National Academy of Medicine

Duty to Plan: Health Care, Crisis Standards of Care, and Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Overview of attention for article published in NAM Perspectives, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 277)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
102 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
246 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Duty to Plan: Health Care, Crisis Standards of Care, and Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.
Published in
NAM Perspectives, March 2020
DOI 10.31478/202003b
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L Hick, Dan Hanfling, Matthew K Wynia, Andrew T Pavia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Other 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 59 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 16%
Engineering 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1019. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,555
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from NAM Perspectives
#2
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#652
of 389,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NAM Perspectives
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them